Galaxy M35 vs Galaxy A34 The Galaxy M35 vs Galaxy A34, two of Samsung’s most talked-about mid-range smartphones, both have a seductive feature set that caters to a range of consumer demands. In light of Samsung’s history of manufacturing high-quality phones for the mid-tier market, these phones aim to blend design, performance, and affordability. For those who appreciate endurance and photography, the Galaxy M35 is ideal because of its large battery and outstanding camera skills. Power users were considered during its development.
On the other hand, the Galaxy A34 takes a more upscale approach thanks to its powerful performance, water and dust resistance, and outstanding software longevity. This comparison will look closely at the Samsung Galaxy M35 and Galaxy A34’s characteristics, which will discuss anything from performance, battery life, and cost to display and design. Understanding the differences between these phones and their strengths will help you select the one that best fits your preferences and way of life.
Design and Build Quality
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Material | Plastic back with a matte finish | Glass back with a premium feel, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | Slim and lightweight | Slightly thicker and heavier |
| Build Quality | Durable plastic build, less prone to fingerprints | Premium feel with glass back, adds a sleek look |
| Water/Dust Resistance | Not officially rated | IP67-rated for water and dust resistance |
| Colors Available | Vibrant colors (e.g., Blue, Green, Black) | Subtle, premium tones (e.g., Graphite, Lime, Violet) |
| Ergonomics | Comfortable to hold with rounded edges | Slightly larger but still ergonomic |
| Design Highlights | Minimalistic design with clean lines | Eye-catching finish with gradient options |
Display Features: Galaxy M35 vs Galaxy A34
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Display Type | PLS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| Screen Size | 6.6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| Resolution | Full HD+ (2408 x 1080 pixels) | Full HD+ (2340 x 1080 pixels) |
| Refresh Rate | 120Hz | 120Hz |
| Brightness | Moderate brightness for indoor and outdoor use | High brightness, excellent outdoor visibility |
| Color Accuracy | Decent, suitable for most tasks | Colour Accuracy |
| Touch Sampling Rate | Standard | Enhanced for smoother touch response |
| Display Protection | Gorilla Glass 3 | Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Special Features | Widevine L1 support for HD streaming | HDR10+ support for enhanced visuals |
Performance Comparison
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1280 / MediaTek Dimensity 900 (region-specific) | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 |
| CPU Architecture | Octa-core | Octa-core |
| GPU | Mali-G68 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| RAM Options | 6GB / 8GB | 6GB / 8GB |
| Storage Options | 128GB / 256GB, expandable via microSD | 128GB / 256GB, expandable via microSD |
| Operating System | Android 13 with One UI 5.1 | Android 13 with One UI 5.1 |
| Gaming Performance | Smooth for casual gaming, decent for heavy games | Optimized for gaming with better thermal management |
| Benchmark Scores | Moderate performance in benchmark tests | Slightly higher scores in benchmarks |
| 5G Connectivity | Yes | Yes |
| Special Features | AI-based optimization for multitasking | Better heat dissipation for prolonged gaming |
Battery Life
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Battery Capacity | 6000mAh | 5000mAh |
| Charging Speed | 25W fast charging | 25W fast charging |
| Charging Time | Approximately 2 hours | Approximately 1.5 hours |
| Battery Optimization | Excellent power management for extended usage | Good optimization for daily tasks |
| Screen-on Time | Up to 12-14 hours | Up to 10-12 hours |
| Usage Pattern Suitability | Ideal for heavy users (gaming, streaming, multitasking) | Suitable for moderate to heavy users |
| Power-Saving Features | Adaptive power-saving mode | Adaptive power-saving mode |
| Reverse Charging | Not supported | Not supported |
Charging Technology
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Charging Speed | 25W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging |
| Charging Port | USB Type-C | USB Type-C |
| Reverse Charging | Not supported | Not supported |
| Charging Time | Approximately 2 hours | Approximately 1.5 hours |
| Wireless Charging | Not supported | Not supported |
| Adaptive Charging | Yes, adaptive power-saving mode | Yes, adaptive power-saving mode |
| Charger Included | Yes (in-box charger) | Yes (in-box charger) |
| Fast Charging Protocol | USB Power Delivery 3.0 | USB Power Delivery 3.0 |
Software and User Experience
| Feature | Samsung Galaxy M35 | Samsung Galaxy A34 |
|---|---|---|
| Operating System | Android 13 with One UI 5.1 | Android 13 with One UI 5.1 |
| Software Updates | 2 years of major updates, 3 years of security patches | 3 years of major updates, 4 years of security patches |
| Custom UI Features | One UI Core (lightweight version) | Full One UI experience with enhanced features |
| Pre-installed Apps | Limited pre-installed apps, less bloatware | Includes additional Samsung ecosystem apps |
| User Interface | Clean, intuitive, optimized for performance | Polished, feature-rich, and customizable |
| Multitasking Support | Supports split-screen and pop-up view | Enhanced multitasking with additional tools |
| Software Enhancements | AI-based battery optimization | AI-based battery optimization and camera tweaks |
| Samsung DeX Support | Not supported | Not supported |
| Special Features | Focus on speed and simplicity | Enhanced ecosystem integration (e.g., SmartThings, Samsung Wallet) |
Conclusion
Galaxy M35 vs Galaxy A34 Despite being excellent mid-range smartphones, the Samsung Galaxy M35 and the Samsung Galaxy A34 cater to quite diverse user needs, making them ideal for specific regions. The Galaxy M35 is the best choice for customers who value a robust battery, good cameras, and a fair price range. Its features are intended for frequent users who use their phones for gaming, multitasking, and photography.
The Galaxy A34 is a more future-proof device for people who appreciate design and dependability because of its excellent build quality, vibrant AMOLED display, and extensive software support. Your personal preferences and priorities, whether they be display quality, battery life, or total value, will ultimately determine which of the Samsung Galaxy M35 and Galaxy A34 is best for you. Samsung’s commitment to both phones provides users with exceptional functionality without going above price, demonstrating quality and innovation in the mid-range market.
FAQ
Q1: Which phone has better battery life, the Galaxy M35 or Galaxy A34?
The Galaxy M35 offers better battery life, thanks to its larger battery capacity and optimization for endurance. It’s an excellent choice for users who need a phone that lasts all day with heavy usage.
Q2: Is the Galaxy A34 more durable than the Galaxy M35?
Yes, the Galaxy A34 features an IP67 rating for water and dust resistance, making it more durable in challenging environments than the Galaxy M35, which lacks official water resistance certification.
Q3: Which phone is better for gaming, the Galaxy M35 or the Galaxy A34?
The Galaxy M35 has a slightly stronger processor in some places, which lets graphically demanding games run more smoothly, but both phones are suitable for gaming.